IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jecsur/v40y2026i1p162-181.html

Multidimensional Regional Development in EU: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandre Canário Borrega
  • Maria da Conceição Peixe Rego
  • Miguel Rocha de Sousa

Abstract

Regional disparities within the EU remain a persistent challenge, demanding comprehensive research. Enhancing cohesion and convergence while promoting sustainability between and within its regions is crucial to addressing these disparities. This study conducts a systematic literature review on regional development in the EU, identifying key determinants and potential sources of these disparities through a multidimensional lens. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses methodology, our database considers 92 papers related to regional development in the EU. Our analysis shows that most studies predominantly focus on economic factors like employment and GDP, and there is an emerging recognition of the necessity to incorporate social and environmental aspects into regional development studies. This study maps the current state of literature and identifies gaps, particularly the need for more multidimensional and holistic approaches on regional development. These findings underscore the importance of a comprehensive approach in future research and policymaking are crucial for addressing regional disparities and promoting sustainable development across the EU regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandre Canário Borrega & Maria da Conceição Peixe Rego & Miguel Rocha de Sousa, 2026. "Multidimensional Regional Development in EU: A Systematic Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 162-181, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:40:y:2026:i:1:p:162-181
    DOI: 10.1111/joes.12708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12708
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joes.12708?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:40:y:2026:i:1:p:162-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0950-0804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.