IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jecsur/v40y2026i1p133-161.html

Psychological Echoes: Exploring Investor Sentiments Across Market Events

Author

Listed:
  • Kirti Goyal
  • Sudipta Kumar Nanda
  • Monika Agrawal

Abstract

This paper aims to present a comprehensive review of existing literature that explores the interplay between psychological factors and investors’ financial behavior in the context of significant events. We retrieved data from the Scopus database from 1991 to 2023. We employed content analysis and bibliometric analysis to reveal the publication trends, citation and authorship records, event types, theories, and psychological aspects associated with the studies. The area of study has grown significantly since 2007. The most prominent keywords were “event study,” “herding,” “behavioral finance,” and “Covid‐19.” The keyword co‐occurrence reveals seven key themes. The efficient market hypothesis is the most cited theory, followed by the prospect theory. Manmade and negative financial events are among the most frequently studied events. Investor sentiment, investor reaction, and herding behavior are the most common psychological aspects. Despite the interest in studying the impact of an external event on investor psychology and investment decisions, no study has carefully explored the intricacies of intellectual progress in this rich body of literature. We measure and assess three decades of research on event‐related investors’ behavior published in prominent journals. This would benefit future researchers interested in understanding event‐related investors’ sentiments from the lens of behavioral finance.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirti Goyal & Sudipta Kumar Nanda & Monika Agrawal, 2026. "Psychological Echoes: Exploring Investor Sentiments Across Market Events," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 133-161, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:40:y:2026:i:1:p:133-161
    DOI: 10.1111/joes.12701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12701
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joes.12701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:40:y:2026:i:1:p:133-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0950-0804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.