IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jecsur/v39y2025i5p2174-2193.html

Quantitative Evaluation of Budget Performance Management Policy: Evidence From China

Author

Listed:
  • Chuan Zhang
  • Jingke Zhang
  • Bo Zhang

Abstract

The quantitative assessment of budget performance management policies is vital for improving the scientific rigor of policy formulation, enhancing the practicality of policy implementation, optimizing public resource distribution, and advancing the refinement of the national governance system. This research, which analyzes 2501 Chinese budget performance management policies from 2001 to 2024, utilizes latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic model, natural language processing (NLP), text encoding techniques, and the PMC‐TE index model to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness and evolutionary trends of China's budget performance management policies at various developmental stages. The result reveals that China's budget performance management policies can be grouped into nine primary policy tools. Notably, financial budget management, resource allocation, and operation management are the most frequently employed and effective policy tools. These policy tools are further divided into three policy domains: financial strategy and social development, financial supervision and innovative management, and financial governance and reform. Furthermore, the historical evolution of China's budget performance management policy tools displays a four‐stage development pattern: foundational and preliminary development, rapid expansion and deepening, peak and adjustment, and optimization and transformation. These findings offer a novel theoretical framework for understanding the progress and patterns of the evolution of China's budget performance management policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuan Zhang & Jingke Zhang & Bo Zhang, 2025. "Quantitative Evaluation of Budget Performance Management Policy: Evidence From China," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 2174-2193, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:39:y:2025:i:5:p:2174-2193
    DOI: 10.1111/joes.12691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12691
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joes.12691?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:39:y:2025:i:5:p:2174-2193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0950-0804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.