IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v60y2026i2ne70056.html

Perceived Gift Value and Subjective Well‐Being of Chinese Older Adults: A Self‐Concept–Based Framework Informed by Zhongyong Thinking

Author

Listed:
  • Weihua Wang
  • Hyeong Yu Jang

Abstract

This study examines how perceived gift value (PGV) is associated with subjective well‐being (SWB) among Chinese older adults during traditional festivals, drawing on Zhongyong thinking as a culturally grounded interpretive framework. Using a mixed‐method design, the findings reveal a dual‐pathway process in which PGV is linked to both independent and interdependent self‐concepts, which are in turn related to higher levels of SWB. Although both pathways contribute meaningfully, Zhongyong thinking asymmetrically shifts their relative psychological weight: it strengthens the relational, interdependent route while tempering the well‐being associated with independent self‐views. These results highlight that gift exchanges operate not merely as material transfers but as psychologically significant interactions associated with dignity, belonging, and emotional balance in later life. The study advances understanding of self‐concept processes in later‐life consumption and offers practical implications for promoting the well‐being of older adults in culturally embedded social contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Weihua Wang & Hyeong Yu Jang, 2026. "Perceived Gift Value and Subjective Well‐Being of Chinese Older Adults: A Self‐Concept–Based Framework Informed by Zhongyong Thinking," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:60:y:2026:i:2:n:e70056
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.70056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.70056
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.70056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:60:y:2026:i:2:n:e70056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.