IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v60y2026i2ne70055.html

Blind Spots in Product Design: Utilitarian–Hedonic Choices, Psychological Processes and Retail Strategy Interplay for Visually Impaired Consumers

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Veneziano Cornacchioni
  • Flávio Santino Bizarrias
  • Evandro Luiz Lopes
  • Marcelo Luiz Dias da Silva Gabriel
  • Ricardo Limongi

Abstract

Visually impaired individuals represent a sizable segment of the global population but remain underrepresented in consumer research. Existing literature mainly frames visually impaired consumers (VICs) through a vulnerability lens, focusing on shopping barriers and assistive remedies. While valuable insights into retail accessibility and inclusion have emerged, little attention has been given to the product development stage, psychological processes, or retail strategies regarding choice. Across three controlled experiments, we examined how limited access to visual information affects product evaluation. Study 1 used a choice‐based conjoint method for attribute evaluation; Study 2 tested psychological boundary conditions for variations in control and trust; and Study 3 established causal effects for utilitarian product and promotion type choices, showing that VICs prefer informative promotional appeals. Findings indicate that VICs rely on a narrower set of aesthetic signals and prioritize utilitarian attributes and information that reduce ambiguity. Conversely, sighted consumers respond more to hedonic features.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Veneziano Cornacchioni & Flávio Santino Bizarrias & Evandro Luiz Lopes & Marcelo Luiz Dias da Silva Gabriel & Ricardo Limongi, 2026. "Blind Spots in Product Design: Utilitarian–Hedonic Choices, Psychological Processes and Retail Strategy Interplay for Visually Impaired Consumers," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:60:y:2026:i:2:n:e70055
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.70055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.70055
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.70055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:60:y:2026:i:2:n:e70055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.