IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v60y2026i2ne70054.html

Unequal Contributions in the Climate Transition: Income and Household Differences in Food‐Related Carbon Emissions in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Su‐Jung Nam
  • Hyesun Hwang
  • Xu Li

Abstract

Climate mitigation policies increasingly extend beyond production and energy systems to encompass everyday consumption practices, including food consumption and waste management. This study examines income‐ and household‐type differences in food‐related carbon emissions behaviors among South Korean households, focusing on beef and grain consumption and food waste generation. Using nationally representative household survey data, we analyze how emissions‐related behaviors vary across income groups and household structures at both the consumption and disposal stages. Results show clear heterogeneity: higher‐income households exhibit greater consumption of carbon‐intensive foods, particularly beef, and higher overall food‐related carbon emissions, whereas lower‐income households display comparatively lower emissions. Differences across household structures further indicate variation in food waste generation and per‐capita emissions. These patterns are consistent with existing evidence on consumption‐based carbon inequality and reflect differences in affordability, household composition, and constrained choice. The findings document systematic variation in consumption and waste patterns across income groups and household structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Su‐Jung Nam & Hyesun Hwang & Xu Li, 2026. "Unequal Contributions in the Climate Transition: Income and Household Differences in Food‐Related Carbon Emissions in South Korea," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:60:y:2026:i:2:n:e70054
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.70054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.70054
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.70054?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hyesun Hwang & Su‐Jung Nam & Yu Lim Lee, 2025. "Reducing Food Waste Behavior for Sustainable Consumption: The Effect of Food Consumption Values on Food Waste," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), March.
    2. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Lipson, Matthew M. & Chard, Rose, 2019. "Temporality, vulnerability, and energy justice in household low carbon innovations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 495-504.
    3. Nicole Darmon & Adam Drewnowski, 2015. "Contribution of food prices and diet cost to socioeconomic disparities in diet quality and health: a systematic review and analysis," Post-Print hal-01774670, HAL.
    4. Laurens Cherchye & Bram De Rock & Frederic Vermeulen, 2009. "Opening the Black Box of Intrahousehold Decision Making: Theory and Nonparametric Empirical Tests of General Collective Consumption Models," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 117(6), pages 1074-1104, December.
    5. Jorgenson, Andrew & Schor, Juliet & Huang, Xiaorui, 2017. "Income Inequality and Carbon Emissions in the United States: A State-level Analysis, 1997–2012," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 40-48.
    6. Jessica Aschemann-Witzel & Ilona De Hooge & Pegah Amani & Tino Bech-Larsen & Marije Oostindjer, 2015. "Consumer-Related Food Waste: Causes and Potential for Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Martin Browning & Pierre-André Chiappori & Arthur Lewbel, 2013. "Estimating Consumption Economies of Scale, Adult Equivalence Scales, and Household Bargaining Power," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 80(4), pages 1267-1303.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anyck Dauphin & Bernard Fortin & Guy Lacroix, 2015. "How Falsifiable is the Collective Model? a New Test with an Application to Monogamous and Bigamous Households in Burkina Faso," Cahiers de recherche 1505, CIRPEE.
    2. Laurens Cherchye & Thomas Demuynck & Bram De Rock & Frederic Vermeulen, 2017. "Household Consumption When the Marriage Is Stable," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(6), pages 1507-1534, June.
    3. Marion Mercier & Rama Lionel Ngenzebuke & Philip Verwimp, 2015. "Are We Counting all the Poor ?Reporting under-and Overestimations in the Headcount," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2015-31, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Cherchye, L.J.H. & de Rock, B. & Vermeulen, F.M.P., 2009. "The Revealed Preference Approach to Collective Consumption Behavior : Nonparametric Testing and Sharing Rule Recovery (Revised version of CentER DP 2007-73)," Other publications TiSEM 4978cecb-9950-4870-adc8-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Laurens CHERCHYE & Thomas DEMUYNCK & Bram DE ROCK, 2010. "Noncooperative household consumption with caring," Working Papers of Department of Economics, Leuven ces10.34, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Economics, Leuven.
    6. Luca Piccoli, 2023. "Female poverty and intrahousehold inequality in transition economies," World of Labour, LISER, pages 353-353, February.
    7. Cherchye, L.J.H. & Demuynck, T. & de Rock, B., 2009. "Degrees of Cooperation in Household Consumption Models : A Revealed Preference Analysis," Other publications TiSEM 097597d5-7724-4d31-b044-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Sabrina Bruyneel & Laurens Cherchye & Bram De Rock, 2012. "Collective consumption models with restricted bargaining weights: an empirical assessment based on experimental data," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 395-421, September.
    9. Guilherme Fonseca Travassos & Alexandre Bragança Coelho & Mary Paula Arends-Kuenning, 2022. "Poverty Among The Elderly: An Application of a Collective Consumption Model in Brazil," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 925-951, September.
    10. Donni, Olivier & Molina, José Alberto, 2018. "Household Collective Models: Three Decades of Theoretical Contributions and Empirical Evidence," IZA Discussion Papers 11915, IZA Network @ LISER.
    11. Laurens Cherchye & Thomas Demuynck & Bram De Rock, 2011. "Revealed Preference Analysis of Non‐Cooperative Household Consumption," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(555), pages 1073-1096, September.
    12. Laurens Cherchye & Bram De Rock & Frederic Vermeulen, 2011. "The Revealed Preference Approach to Collective Consumption Behaviour: Testing and Sharing Rule Recovery," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 78(1), pages 176-198.
    13. Cherchye, Laurens & Cosaert, Sam & De Rock, Bram & Kerstens, Pieter Jan & Vermeulen, Frederic, 2018. "Individual welfare analysis for collective households," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 98-114.
    14. Schneider, Kate R., 2022. "Nationally representative estimates of the cost of adequate diets, nutrient level drivers, and policy options for households in rural Malawi," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    15. Cherchye, Laurens & De Rock, Bram & Vermeulen, Frederic, 2012. "Economic well-being and poverty among the elderly: An analysis based on a collective consumption model," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 985-1000.
    16. Pierre-André Chiappori & Costas Meghir, 2014. "Intrahousehold Inequality," NBER Working Papers 20191, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Yu, Yangcheng & Li, Shi & Chen, Yuanyuan, 2025. "Measuring child poverty in rural China: Evidence from households with left-behind and non-left-behind children," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    18. Richard Blundell & Heidi Karjalainen & Valérie Lechene & Krishna Pendakur, 2025. "Gender inequality in expenditure: Great Britain 1978 to 2019," IFS Working Papers W25/26, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    19. Li, Jinjing & O'Donoghue, Cathal, 2011. "Retirement Choice Simulation in Household Settings with Heterogeneous Pension Plans," IZA Discussion Papers 5866, IZA Network @ LISER.
    20. Wanqi Liang & Wenying Li & Qingxiao Li & Shuoli Zhao, 2026. "Intrahousehold Resource Allocation and Child Food Poverty in the United States," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 675-694, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:60:y:2026:i:2:n:e70054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.