IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v59y2025i4ne70034.html

The Dark Side of AI in Insurance: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms Linking AI Design Features to Consumer Harm

Author

Listed:
  • Zhangwei Zheng
  • Qin Lingda Tan
  • Xiaowei Zheng
  • Yaliu Yang

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping insurance services, yet it introduces significant consumer risks such as privacy erosion, service exclusion, and trust deterioration. This systematic review clarifies how specific AI features—algorithmic opacity, hyper‐personalization, and data‐driven bias—trigger psychological responses and shape consumer decisions, ultimately producing negative outcomes. Drawing from 33 empirical studies, the review organizes fragmented findings using the TCCM (Theory–Context–Characteristic–Method) framework, revealing theoretical fragmentation, geographical concentration, and methodological imbalance. To move beyond static categorizations, the study proposes a novel Trigger–Psychology–Decision–Outcome (TPDO) framework that maps sequential pathways of consumer harm. Findings show that adverse consumer outcomes emerge primarily through fairness concerns, anxiety, and perceived loss of control, influencing behaviors such as disengagement and resistance to AI‐enabled insurance systems. This mechanism‐based synthesis provides theoretical clarity, outlines targeted avenues for future research, and informs consumer‐centric governance of algorithmic insurance.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhangwei Zheng & Qin Lingda Tan & Xiaowei Zheng & Yaliu Yang, 2025. "The Dark Side of AI in Insurance: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms Linking AI Design Features to Consumer Harm," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:59:y:2025:i:4:n:e70034
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.70034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.70034
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.70034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:59:y:2025:i:4:n:e70034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.