IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v59y2025i4ne70033.html

Incentivizing or Disincentivizing? How Perceived Social Mobility Affects Consumers' Risk Preference

Author

Listed:
  • Heping He
  • Siwei Liu
  • Yongzhang Liu
  • Monika Kukar‐Kinney

Abstract

Individuals make subjective judgments about the probability of their current social class changing in the future, and this judgment is known as perceived social mobility. Studies have explored the impact of perceived social mobility on consumer psychology and behavior; however, they have not linked it to risk preference. Based on social cognitive theory, this research examines the impact of perceived social mobility on consumers' risk preference and its underlying mechanism. Five studies are conducted to test the proposed conceptual model. Findings indicate that low perceived social mobility reduces consumers' risk preference compared to high perceived social mobility, with self‐efficacy playing a mediating role in this relationship. Alternative mediators, including sense of control and sense of power, are excluded. Time orientation plays a moderating role in this relationship. The findings advance research on perceived social mobility and risk preference, while guiding consumers to make informed consumption decisions that protect their interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Heping He & Siwei Liu & Yongzhang Liu & Monika Kukar‐Kinney, 2025. "Incentivizing or Disincentivizing? How Perceived Social Mobility Affects Consumers' Risk Preference," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:59:y:2025:i:4:n:e70033
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.70033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.70033
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.70033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:59:y:2025:i:4:n:e70033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.