IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v59y2025i4ne70032.html

Revisiting Algorithmic Bounded Rationality With Potential Solutions: How Recommendation Systems Amplify Cognitive Biases in Consumer Decision‐Making

Author

Listed:
  • Wookjae Heo

Abstract

Algorithm‐driven platforms have become central to modern consumer decision‐making. While consumers have always been subject to bounded rationality, recent discussion suggests that personalized recommendation systems can further constrain consumer choices and, in turn, reinforce various cognitive biases. This article explores the theoretical underpinnings of bounded rationality in the context of algorithmically curated content, outlines key biases that are exacerbated by these systems, and discusses the societal implications of algorithmic confinement—from political polarization to consumer rights concerns. Finally, it proposes potential solutions, including policy‐based interventions, forced diversity mechanisms, and consumer education approaches that can mitigate the adverse effects of algorithm‐driven recommendation systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Wookjae Heo, 2025. "Revisiting Algorithmic Bounded Rationality With Potential Solutions: How Recommendation Systems Amplify Cognitive Biases in Consumer Decision‐Making," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:59:y:2025:i:4:n:e70032
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.70032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.70032
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.70032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:59:y:2025:i:4:n:e70032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.