IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v59y2025i4ne70031.html

Impact of Information Overload on Consumer Decision‐Making in the Agri‐Food Sector: A Stimulus‐Organism‐Response Theory Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Bingyu Ying
  • Yanqing Duan
  • Shuangyu Zheng
  • Xiaoping Zheng

Abstract

In the era of big data and AI, consumers are confronted with an overwhelming amount of information and a wide range of choices when purchasing agri‐food products online. This can significantly impact their decision‐making processes. However, there is currently insufficient comprehensive understanding regarding how information overload influences consumer purchasing decisions in the agri‐food sector and whether differences in personal cognition and knowledge moderate this effect. This study aims to address this knowledge deficiency. Drawing on the stimulus‐organism‐response (S‐O‐R) theory, an influence mechanism model is developed to examine the impact of information overload on consumers' decision deferral. A situational experiment involving 430 agri‐food consumers is conducted to empirically test the proposed model. The results show that information overload significantly affects the level of consumer confusion. This, in turn, causes a deferral of purchase decisions. Furthermore, both cognitive need and consumer knowledge negatively moderate the relationship between information overload and consumer confusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Bingyu Ying & Yanqing Duan & Shuangyu Zheng & Xiaoping Zheng, 2025. "Impact of Information Overload on Consumer Decision‐Making in the Agri‐Food Sector: A Stimulus‐Organism‐Response Theory Perspective," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:59:y:2025:i:4:n:e70031
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.70031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.70031
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.70031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:59:y:2025:i:4:n:e70031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.