IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v59y2025i3ne70021.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A National Risk Aversion Perspective on Pension Contributions and Benefits Paid: Insights From OECD Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Van Dinh
  • Thai Le
  • Huong Phung

Abstract

This study delves into the role of national risk aversion culture and other institutional factors, such as financial efficiency, stock market volatility, technology development, age dependency, labor education, life expectancy, and mortality rate, in shaping pension contributions and paid benefits, with evidence drawn from OECD countries. Reputable data sources, such as OECD Statistics, the Global Preference Survey, Global Financial Data, and World Development Indicators, were utilized in the study. The authors adopted a two‐way fixed effects regression model and other alternative estimators (FGLS and GMM) to address heteroscedasticity, serial correlation, and potential endogeneity. The sensitivity and robustness checks confirmed the significant impact (more than 60%) of national risk aversion and other institutional factors on pension contributions and benefits paid. This study aims to bridge the gap between theoretical perspectives and practical implications for policymakers and individuals in developing suitable risk‐based pension programs and improving the management practices of pension systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Van Dinh & Thai Le & Huong Phung, 2025. "A National Risk Aversion Perspective on Pension Contributions and Benefits Paid: Insights From OECD Countries," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:59:y:2025:i:3:n:e70021
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.70021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.70021
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.70021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:59:y:2025:i:3:n:e70021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.