IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v64y2026i5p1783-1813.html

How Fragmented Are Global Policy Debates on Health Data Sharing? Studying Fragmentation Through Discourse Network Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Weickardt Soares
  • Anna Holzscheiter

Abstract

Global policy‐making is often described as taking place in a fragmented and complex institutional landscape. In this article, we revisit the verdict of fragmentation through the lens of discourse network analysis, seeking to understand the extent to which global policy debates can be characterised as fragmented. Examining the case of health data sharing (HDS), an area marked by competing norms and rules, we present results from a longitudinal analysis of the trajectories of HDS policy frames (1995 to 2019). We study discursive fragmentation empirically by analysing three indicators: (1) frame diversification; (2) the increase of conflicting frames (frame contestation); and (3) the emergence of at least three clusters (‘discourse coalitions’) in our networks. We observe that HDS is marked by both centralisation and fragmentation dynamics. We conclude that, despite its self‐portrayal as a global health actor, the European Union has played a marginal role in the debates under scrutiny.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Weickardt Soares & Anna Holzscheiter, 2026. "How Fragmented Are Global Policy Debates on Health Data Sharing? Studying Fragmentation Through Discourse Network Analysis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(5), pages 1783-1813, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:64:y:2026:i:5:p:1783-1813
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.70099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70099
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.70099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:64:y:2026:i:5:p:1783-1813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.