IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v64y2026i1p341-353.html

Selective Reconstruction: Re‐Engagement in the Post‐Brexit UK–EU Security Relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Martill
  • Helena Carrapico

Abstract

The United Kingdom's departure from the European Union has significantly reshaped the UK–EU security relationship, including both foreign, security and defence policy and police and judicial co‐operation in criminal matters. Whilst Brexit has mainly been discussed in the academic literature as a form of disengagement from the EU, recent developments indicate a nuanced process of selective reconstruction and re‐engagement in the current post‐Brexit period. This editorial introduces the concept of ‘re‐engagement’ as a distinct analytical framework to capture the unique dynamics emerging in the wake of Brexit, which are distinct from both prior EU membership and the disengagement experienced during the withdrawal period. Specifically, it proposes seven characteristics of re‐engagement that can contribute to a greater understanding of post‐Brexit security co‐operation: (1) the perceived directionality of the co‐operation, (2) increased re‐institutionalisation incentives, (3) political path dependence, (4) temporal distance, (5) institutional change, (6) alternatives to re‐engagement and (7) sustainability. By reflecting on these seven characteristics in the context of contemporary developments in the UK–EU security relationship, the editorial underscores how past political trajectories and evolving geopolitical contexts, such as the Ukraine war, have shaped current co‐operative practices and enabled different outcomes for different policy areas within the UK–EU security relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Martill & Helena Carrapico, 2026. "Selective Reconstruction: Re‐Engagement in the Post‐Brexit UK–EU Security Relationship," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 341-353, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:64:y:2026:i:1:p:341-353
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.70005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.70005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Usherwood, 2021. "‘Our European Friends and Partners’? Negotiating the Trade and Cooperation Agreement," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(S1), pages 115-123, September.
    2. Stéphanie C. Hofmann, 2011. "Why Institutional Overlap Matters: CSDP in the European Security Architecture," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 101-120, January.
    3. Andrew Moravcsik, 1993. "Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 473-524, December.
    4. Johan P. Olsen, 2002. "The Many Faces of Europeanization," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(5), pages 921-952, December.
    5. Øyvind Svendsen & Rebecca Adler‐Nissen, 2019. "Differentiated (Dis)integration in Practice: The Diplomacy of Brexit and the Low Politics of High Politics," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 1419-1430, November.
    6. Benjamin Leruth & Stefan Gänzle & Jarle Trondal, 2019. "Differentiated Integration and Disintegration in the EU after Brexit: Risks versus Opportunities," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 1383-1394, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sophie Jacquot & Cornelia Woll, 2003. "Usage of European Integration - Europeanisation from a Sociological Perspective," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-01019642, HAL.
    2. Maas, W.M., 2008. "Fleeing to Europe," ISS Working Papers - General Series 18740, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    3. Sophie Jacquot & Cornelia Woll, 2003. "Usage of European Integration - Europeanisation from a Sociological Perspective," Post-Print hal-01019642, HAL.
    4. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/8391 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Richard Perkins & Eric Neumayer, 2007. "Do Membership Benefits Buy Regulatory Compliance?," European Union Politics, , vol. 8(2), pages 180-206, June.
    6. Diana Panke, 2020. "Regional cooperation through the lenses of states: Why do states nurture regional integration?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 475-504, April.
    7. Patrick Müller and Nicole Alecu de Flers, 2009. "Applying the Concept of Europeanization to the Study of Foreign Policy: Dimensions and Mechanisms," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 5, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    8. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8391 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Zoltán GRÜNHUT, 2017. "Concepts, approaches and methods on europeanisation – a meta-analysis," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 8, pages 157-176, June.
    10. Angelos Chryssogelos, 2017. "Still Europeanised? Greek Foreign Policy During the Eurozone Crisis," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 118, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.
    11. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:483-506 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Malte Tobias Kähler, 2011. "From German Rules to European Discretion: Policy’s Slippery Slope," Chapters, in: David Howden (ed.), Institutions in Crisis, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Eric Tremolada & Carlos Tassara & Olivier Costa, 2019. "Colombia y la Unión Europea. Una asociación cada vez más estrecha," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1101.
    14. Noriaki Matsushima & Ryusuke Shinohara, 2015. "The efficiency of monopolistic provision of public goods through simultaneous bilateral bargaining," ISER Discussion Paper 0948, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
    15. Fuß, Julia & Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian & Saravia, Andrés & Zürn, Michael, 2021. "Managing regime complexity: Introducing the interface conflicts 1.0 dataset," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2021-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    16. Seikel, Daniel, 2011. "Wie die Europäische Kommission Liberalisierung durchsetzt: Der Konflikt um das öffentlich-rechtliche Bankenwesen in Deutschland," MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/16, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    17. Thumira Gunasena, 2016. "The applicability of adopting European Union?s integration model in South Asia: A comparative analysis of European Union and South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation," International Journal of Social Sciences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 5(2), pages 19-43, May.
    18. Tanja A. Börzel, 2010. "The Transformative Power of Europe Reloaded - The Limits of External Europeanization," KFG Working Papers p0011, Free University Berlin.
    19. Andreas Kyriacou, 2009. "Decision rules, membership and political centralization in the European Union," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 143-158, April.
    20. Anu Toots & Leif Kalev, 2016. "Governing in the shadow of Bologna: return of the state in higher education quality assurance policy," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1/2), pages 54-70.
    21. David Moloney & Mads Dagnis Jensen, 2025. "Brexit Rhapsody: Exploring Patterns of Issue Salience in the Negotiations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 507-525, March.
    22. Thomas Fetzer, 2010. "The Europeanization of employee participation: Britain and Germany in historical and contemporary perspective," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 31(4_suppl), pages 3-8, November.
    23. Liesbet Hooghe & Gary Marks, 2015. "Delegation and pooling in international organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 305-328, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:64:y:2026:i:1:p:341-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.