IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v63y2025i6p1822-1844.html

The New CAP and the Participative Method in Decision‐Making: A Textual Analysis of the Italian Case

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Henke
  • Tommaso Pomponi
  • Marco Vassallo
  • Giampiero Mazzocchi
  • Alessandro Monteleone
  • Alessandro Sorrentino

Abstract

The main objective of this article is to analyse the role of the partnership approach in the decision process regarding the new CAP reform that guaranteed higher flexibility and better targeting. What was the impact of the multi‐actor decision‐making process on the reform process? How can policies be designed to increasingly listen to stakeholders' needs? To answer these questions, stakeholder interventions at the Partnership Table were analysed with a text mining and a sentiment analysis applied to the transcripts. Despite several weaknesses and biases in bringing national stakeholders to the institutional tables, the decision process moved towards a higher rate of flexibility, subsidiarity and transparency, overtaking the concept of ‘one size fits all’ that has dominated the CAP. The downside of this aspect is that the reform might favour member states with a solid tradition of CAP reception and administrative efficiency, able to move smoothly towards an effective participatory approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Henke & Tommaso Pomponi & Marco Vassallo & Giampiero Mazzocchi & Alessandro Monteleone & Alessandro Sorrentino, 2025. "The New CAP and the Participative Method in Decision‐Making: A Textual Analysis of the Italian Case," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(6), pages 1822-1844, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:63:y:2025:i:6:p:1822-1844
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13703
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13703?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:63:y:2025:i:6:p:1822-1844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.