IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v63y2025i4p1259-1279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divergent Attitudes of Eurosceptic Parties Towards Intergovernmental and Supranational EU Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Nikolai Gad
  • Eugénia C. Heldt
  • Robert Csehi

Abstract

How do Eurosceptic parties position themselves regarding individual European Union (EU) institutions? Using Euromanifesto data from 1979 to 2019, this study addresses this question by disaggregating the attitudes of party families towards separate intergovernmental and supranational EU institutions. It focuses on the relationship between the identities of radical left‐ and right‐wing parties and Euroscepticism. The findings reveal that post‐communist parties are more sceptical of intergovernmental institutions than nationalist parties, whilst nationalist parties are more sceptical of supranational institutions. Despite widespread Euroscepticism in both nationalist and post‐communist party families, nationalist parties' attitudes towards intergovernmental institutions align with those of other party families. In contrast, post‐communist parties support the transfer of more competences to the European Parliament but are sceptical of intergovernmental institutions. These results suggest that foundational party identities influence party‐based Euroscepticism, which has implications for the EU's handling of increasing Euroscepticism.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikolai Gad & Eugénia C. Heldt & Robert Csehi, 2025. "Divergent Attitudes of Eurosceptic Parties Towards Intergovernmental and Supranational EU Institutions," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(4), pages 1259-1279, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:63:y:2025:i:4:p:1259-1279
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13701
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:63:y:2025:i:4:p:1259-1279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.