IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v63y2025i3p1008-1021.html

The European Union's Global Health Actorness: A Research Agenda for a New Age of Pandemics

Author

Listed:
  • Óscar Fernández

Abstract

Whilst the European Union's (EU's) response to health emergencies has historically been subpar, some suggest that it emerged from COVID‐19 as a stronger global health actor. This prompts two interrelated questions: how have International Relations scholars conceptualised and assessed EU ‘actorness’ in the all‐too‐often neglected field of global health, and what adjustments are required in anticipation of a potential new age of pandemics? This article revisits the longstanding notion of ‘actorness’ and dissects the few studies that apply it systematically to analyse the EU's role in global health. After identifying some key shortcomings in the literature, the article formulates a research agenda suitable for the complex and high‐stakes nature of contemporary global health endeavours. By further adapting the concept of ‘actorness’ to a multifaceted EU external action as well as to an increasingly intricate global governance architecture, this research agenda contributes to the broader scholarship on the EU's international outreach.

Suggested Citation

  • Óscar Fernández, 2025. "The European Union's Global Health Actorness: A Research Agenda for a New Age of Pandemics," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(3), pages 1008-1021, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:63:y:2025:i:3:p:1008-1021
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13645
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13645?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Hill, 1993. "The Capability‐Expectations Gap, or Conceptualizing Europe's International Role," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 305-328, September.
    2. Karen E. Smith, 2006. "Speaking with One Voice? European Union Co‐ordination on Human Rights Issues at the United Nations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 113-137, March.
    3. Robert Kissack, 2023. "Does the EU Benefit From Increased Complexity? Capital Punishment in the Human Rights Regime," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 17-28.
    4. Daniel C. Thomas, 2012. "Still Punching below Its Weight? Coherence and Effectiveness in European Union Foreign Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 457-474, May.
    5. Thomas Gehring & Sebastian Oberthur & Marc Mühleck, 2013. "European union actorness in international institutions: Why the EU is recognized as an actor in some international institutions, but not in others," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/168144, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Henrik Larsen, 2020. "Normative Power Europe or Capability–expectations Gap? The Performativity of Concepts in the Study of European Foreign Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 962-977, July.
    7. Robert Kissack, 2023. "Does the EU Benefit From Increased Complexity? Capital Punishment in the Human Rights Regime," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 17-28.
    8. Ian Manners, 2002. "Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 235-258, June.
    9. Thomas Gehring & Sebastian Oberthür & Marc Mühleck, 2013. "European Union Actorness in International Institutions: Why the EU is Recognized as an Actor in Some International Institutions, but Not in Others," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 849-865, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Merran Hulse, 2014. "Actorness beyond the European Union: Comparing the International Trade Actorness of SADC and ECOWAS," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 547-565, May.
    2. Erickson, Jennifer L., 2008. "Normative power and EU arms transfer policy: A theoretical critique and empirical test [Normative Macht und die EU-Waffenlieferungspolitik: Eine theoretische Kritik und ein empirischer Test]," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2008-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Thomas Gehring & Kevin Urbanski & Sebastian Oberthür, 2017. "The European Union as an Inadvertent Great Power: EU Actorness and the Ukraine Crisis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 727-743, July.
    4. Bettina Ahrens, 2018. "Normative power Europe in crisis? Understanding the productive role of ambiguity for the EU’s transformative agenda," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 199-212, June.
    5. Jordi Mas, 2021. "The Power of Cohesiveness: Internal Factors that Influence the External Performance of Regions," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 963-980, July.
    6. May-Britt Stumbaum, 2015. "The diffusion of norms in security-related fields: views from China, India and the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 331-347, September.
    7. Chris J. Bickerton & Bastien Irondelle & Anand Menon, 2011. "Security Co‐operation beyond the Nation‐State: The EU's Common Security and Defence Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Scott Lavery & Davide Schmid, 2021. "European Integration and the New Global Disorder," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1322-1338, September.
    9. Chiara De Franco & Christoph O. Meyer & Karen E. Smith, 2015. "‘Living by Example?’ The European Union and the Implementation of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P)," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 994-1009, September.
    10. Dimitris Bouris & Saul Kenny & Hanna L. Mühlenhoff, 2025. "Queering European Union Foreign and Security Policy: Invisibility, Heteronormativity and Binaries in the EU's Approach to Women, Peace and Security," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(5), pages 1509-1527, September.
    11. Robert Kissack, 2023. "Does the EU Benefit From Increased Complexity? Capital Punishment in the Human Rights Regime," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 17-28.
    12. Laura Allison-Reumann, 2017. "ASEAN and human rights: challenges to the EU’s diffusion of human rights norms," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 39-54, March.
    13. Xianbai Ji, 2026. "From Indo-Pacific back to Euro-Atlantic? The Ukraine War and the EU’s strategic reorientation," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 151-171, March.
    14. Steffen Murau & Kilian Spandler, 2016. "EU, US and ASEAN Actorness in G20 Financial Policy‐Making: Bridging the EU Studies–New Regionalism Divide," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 928-943, July.
    15. James Rogers, 2009. "From ‘Civilian Power’ to ‘Global Power’: Explicating the European Union's ‘Grand Strategy’ Through the Articulation of Discourse Theory," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 831-862, September.
    16. Henrik Larsen, 2020. "Normative Power Europe or Capability–expectations Gap? The Performativity of Concepts in the Study of European Foreign Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 962-977, July.
    17. Helene Sjursen & Federica Bicchi & Marianna Lovato, 2026. "Keep on Talking! The Resilience of Multilateral Communications in EU Foreign Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 1175-1189, May.
    18. Tom Delreux & Joseph Earsom, 2023. "The European Union as an Actor Navigating International Regime Complexes," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 1-5.
    19. Hidetaka Yoshimatsu, 2024. "Expanding the study of the EU-centred actorness: ASEAN in the emerging Indo-Pacific construct," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 103-119, March.
    20. Guy Harpaz & Asaf Shamis, 2010. "Normative Power Europe and the State of Israel: An Illegitimate EUtopia?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 579-616, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:63:y:2025:i:3:p:1008-1021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.