IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v56y2018i6p1376-1393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EU Investors versus EU States: International Arbitration of Investment Disputes

Author

Listed:
  • Julian Donaubauer
  • Peter Nunnenkamp

Abstract

Recent information on investor‐state dispute settlement, collected by UNCTAD, suggests that European investors are more litigious than non‐European investors. Most of the intra‐EU claims for financial compensation are directed at relatively poor respondent states in Central Europe. However, private investors win surprisingly few intra‐EU disputes. The appointment bias of arbitrators and the composition of tribunals appear to matter for the outcome of investor‐state dispute settlement.

Suggested Citation

  • Julian Donaubauer & Peter Nunnenkamp, 2018. "EU Investors versus EU States: International Arbitration of Investment Disputes," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(6), pages 1376-1393, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:56:y:2018:i:6:p:1376-1393
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12748
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.12748?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leslie Johns & Calvin Thrall & Rachel L. Wellhausen, 2020. "Judicial economy and moving bars in international investment arbitration," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 923-945, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:56:y:2018:i:6:p:1376-1393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.