IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v56y2018i3p520-538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Practice Goes beyond Legislators' Expectations: Analysis of Practical Implementation Exceeding Legal Compliance with EU Directives

Author

Listed:
  • Asya Zhelyazkova
  • Cansarp Kaya
  • Reini Schrama

Abstract

Whereas most research focuses on non†compliant implementation, we lack understanding of implementers' incentives and abilities to outperform national legislation. This study investigates a largely under†researched question: to what extent practical implementation exceeds levels of legislative compliance with EU requirements? To explain this phenomenon, we focus on the responsiveness of implementing actors to external (participation in transnational networks) and domestic pressures (national societal attitudes) for compliance with EU requirements and the availability of additional expertise at the implementation stage (bottom†up). Moreover, implementing actors are unlikely to respond in the same way to different types of national legislative problems (top†down). The findings suggest that implementers often outperform the transposition of EU laws. Practical outperformance depends on the level of societal support for external policies and is a response to incomplete or ambiguous domestic formal rules.

Suggested Citation

  • Asya Zhelyazkova & Cansarp Kaya & Reini Schrama, 2018. "When Practice Goes beyond Legislators' Expectations: Analysis of Practical Implementation Exceeding Legal Compliance with EU Directives," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 520-538, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:56:y:2018:i:3:p:520-538
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12637
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.12637?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rik Joosen & Asya Zhelyazkova, 2022. "How Do Supranational Regulators Keep Companies in Line? An Analysis of the Enforcement Styles of EU Agencies," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 983-1000, July.
    2. Steffen Hurka & Yves Steinebach, 2021. "Legal Instrument Choice in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 278-296, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:56:y:2018:i:3:p:520-538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.