IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v56y2018i2p368-384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inside the EU Commission: Evidence on the Perceived Relevance of the Secretariat General in Climate Policy†Making

Author

Listed:
  • Thurid Hustedt
  • Markus Seyfried

Abstract

This article studies the perception of the EU Commission's Secretariat General in policy†making. Recently, research on EU institutions devotes increasing attention to analyzing structures and procedures of decision†making in EU institutions, most notably the EU Commission. Conventionally, the EU Commission is portrayed as a fragmented organization, divided along the lines of staff nationality, sectoral responsibilities and cabinets and General Directorates (DGs). The Secretariat General has long been viewed a weak actor that is hardly able or motivated to steer internal decision†making. However, recent research indicates a changing role of the Secretariat General as a pro†active broker and last arbiter. This article studies how the Secretariat General is perceived by the DGs in policy coordination and argues that this perception depends on the pattern of political authority, bureaucratic roles and the relevance and the alternatives prevailing in the policy field. The article is based on data from a survey among Commission officials.

Suggested Citation

  • Thurid Hustedt & Markus Seyfried, 2018. "Inside the EU Commission: Evidence on the Perceived Relevance of the Secretariat General in Climate Policy†Making," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 368-384, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:56:y:2018:i:2:p:368-384
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12605
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.12605?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:56:y:2018:i:2:p:368-384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.