IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v52y2014i5p1019-1034.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Decides What EU Issues Ministers Talk About? Explaining Governmental EU Policy Co-Ordination in Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Hyvärinen
  • Tapio Raunio

Abstract

The political dynamics of European Union (EU) governance has arguably strengthened the role of civil servants at the expense of democratically elected office-holders. However, whether this applies to intra-cabinet EU decision-making is more difficult to analyze. Drawing on the agendas (1995–2012) of the Finnish ministerial EU Committee and on interviews with key civil servants, this article examines whether the interests of governing parties or bureaucratic procedures are more important in determining which EU policies are debated by the government and which in turn are decentralized to individual ministries. The analysis confirms the strong influence of both established administrative procedures and of a small elite of civil servants in setting the agenda of governmental EU policy formulation. The paper also shows that intra-cabinet co-ordination focuses on high politics issues, with individual EU laws seldom discussed by the government – a finding that raises important questions about the accountability of domestic EU co-ordination.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Hyvärinen & Tapio Raunio, 2014. "Who Decides What EU Issues Ministers Talk About? Explaining Governmental EU Policy Co-Ordination in Finland," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 1019-1034, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:52:y:2014:i:5:p:1019-1034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/jcms.12134
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goetz, Klaus H.; Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik, . "The Europeanisation of national political systems: Parliaments and executives," Living Reviews in European Governance (LREG), Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Merethe Dotterud Leiren & Kacper Szulecki & Tim Rayner & Catherine Banet, 2019. "Energy Security Concerns versus Market Harmony: The Europeanisation of Capacity Mechanisms," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 92-104.
    2. Sprungk, Carina, 2010. "Ever more or ever better scrutiny? Analysing the conditions of effective national parliamentary involvement in EU affairs," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 14, June.
    3. Katrin Auel & Oliver Höing, 2014. "Parliaments in the Euro Crisis: Can the Losers of Integration Still Fight Back?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(6), pages 1184-1193, November.
    4. Daniel Finke & Annika Herbel, 2015. "Beyond rules and resources: Parliamentary scrutiny of EU policy proposals," European Union Politics, , vol. 16(4), pages 490-513, December.
    5. Thomas Winzen, 2013. "European integration and national parliamentary oversight institutions," European Union Politics, , vol. 14(2), pages 297-323, June.
    6. Nora Dörrenbächer & Ellen Mastenbroek & Dimiter D. Toshkov, 2015. "National Parliaments and Transposition of EU Law: A Matter of Coalition Conflict?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 1010-1026, September.
    7. Patrick Müller and Nicole Alecu de Flers, 2009. "Applying the Concept of Europeanization to the Study of Foreign Policy: Dimensions and Mechanisms," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 5, Institute for European integration research (EIF).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:52:y:2014:i:5:p:1019-1034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.