IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v40y2002i3p491-513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Expand?: The Question of Legitimacy and Justification in the EU’s Enlargement Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Helene Sjursen

Abstract

Why does the European Union (EU) enlarge and why does it make certain prioritizations amongst applicants in the enlargement process? In this article, different reasons that have been used in mobilizing for enlargement are examined. An analytical distinction is made between three different types of reasons: pragmatic, ethical–political and moral. The conclusion is that ethical–political reasons, which testify to a sense of kinship–based duty, are particularly important in mobilizing for enlargement to incorporate central and eastern Europe and thus also central to an appreciation of prioritizations in the EU’s enlargement policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Helene Sjursen, 2002. "Why Expand?: The Question of Legitimacy and Justification in the EU’s Enlargement Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 491-513, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:40:y:2002:i:3:p:491-513
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-5965.00366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00366
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-5965.00366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Senem Aydın‐Düzgit & Gergana Noutcheva, 2022. "External Contestations of Europe: Russia and Turkey as Normative Challengers?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1815-1831, November.
    2. Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Helene Sjursen & Guri Rosén, 2017. "Arguing Sanctions. On the EU's Response to the Crisis in Ukraine," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 20-36, January.
    3. Chris J. Bickerton, 2011. "Towards a Social Theory of EU Foreign and Security Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 171-190, January.
    4. Cengiz Erisen & Elif Erisen, 2014. "Attitudinal Ambivalence towards Turkey's EU Membership," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 217-233, March.
    5. Christoffer Kølvraa, 2016. "European Fantasies: On the EU's Political Myths and the Affective Potential of Utopian Imaginaries for European Identity," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 169-184, January.
    6. Jutta Gunther & Gresa Latifi & Judyta Lubacha-Sember & Daniel Tobelmann, 2017. "Scientific Cooperation in a German-Polish Border Region in the Light of EU Enlargement," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 42-53.
    7. Vaaks Katri, 2013. "The European Union in the Estonian Public Discourse," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 3(2), pages 50-67, October.
    8. Marie‐Ève Bélanger & Natasha Wunsch, 2022. "From Cohesion to Contagion? Populist Radical Right Contestation of EU Enlargement," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 653-672, May.
    9. Kilian Spandler, 2018. "Regional standards of membership and enlargement in the EU and ASEAN," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 183-198, June.
    10. Thomas Plümper & Christina J. Schneider, 2007. "Discriminatory European Union Membership and the Redistribution of Enlargement Gains," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 51(4), pages 568-587, August.
    11. Stefan Auer, 2010. "'New Europe': Between Cosmopolitan Dreams and Nationalist Nightmares," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48, pages 1163-1184, November.
    12. Stefan Auer, 2010. "‘New Europe’: Between Cosmopolitan Dreams and Nationalist Nightmares," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(5), pages 1163-1184, November.
    13. Besir Ceka & Aleksandra Sojka, 2016. "Loving it but not feeling it yet? The state of European identity after the eastern enlargement," European Union Politics, , vol. 17(3), pages 482-503, September.
    14. Erdi Kutlu & Çağdaş Cengiz & Murat Necip Arman & Emir Ozeren, 2021. "Understanding the Role of Leadership Styles of Erdogan and Merkel in Sustainability of Turkey-European Union Relations: A Leadership Trait Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:40:y:2002:i:3:p:491-513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.