IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v39y2001i4p641-661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Democracy in a Contested Polity

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Lord

Abstract

After reviewing difficulties with the literature on the democratic deficit, this article concludes that a method is needed for assessing democracy in a political system where there is fundamental agreement on what would constitute adequately democratic institutions. It then goes on to explore two suggestions for such a method: the development of well‐specified indicators of democratic performance for contrasting ideal‐types of Euro‐democracy; and the attribution of self‐ and peer assessments to institutional actors with competing perspectives on democratic standards in the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Lord, 2001. "Assessing Democracy in a Contested Polity," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 641-661, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:39:y:2001:i:4:p:641-661
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-5965.00325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00325
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-5965.00325?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sabine Saurugger, 2007. "Democratic ‘Misfit’? Conceptions of Civil Society Participation in France and the European Union," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(2), pages 384-404, June.
    2. Štěpán Strnad, 2013. "Crisis of the European Union Legitimacy - No European Demos in Sight [Krize legitimity Evropské unie - evropský démos v nedohledu]," Současná Evropa, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2013(1), pages 123-140.
    3. Peters, Anne, 2003. "A Plea for a European Semi-Parliamentary and Semi-Consociational Democracy," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 7, March.
    4. Pieter Bouwen, 2003. "The Democratic Legitimacy of Business Interest Representation in the European Union: Normative Implications of the Logic of Access," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2003_8, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:39:y:2001:i:4:p:641-661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.