IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v36y1998i3p391-404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coalition‐Sensitive Voting Power in the Council of Ministers: The Case of Eastern Enlargement

Author

Listed:
  • G. Michael Winkler

Abstract

The Shapley value is used to analyse the distribution of voting power for qualified majority decisions in the EU Council. Coalition‐neutral and coalition‐sensitive voting power are distinguished. In large unions such as the current Union of the Fifteen, the distribution of coalition‐neutral voting power almost coincides with the distribution of votes, whereas the coalition‐sensitive voting power of a Member State may deviate considerably from its share of votes and react strongly to small changes in circumstances. The case of eastern enlargement of the Union is used to demonstrate that coalition‐sensitive voting power appropriately exhibits the Member States’ influence in the Council.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Michael Winkler, 1998. "Coalition‐Sensitive Voting Power in the Council of Ministers: The Case of Eastern Enlargement," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 391-404, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:36:y:1998:i:3:p:391-404
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-5965.00116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00116
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-5965.00116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sutter, Matthias, 2000. "Flexible Integration, EMU and Relative Voting Power in the EU," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 104(1-2), pages 41-62, July.
    2. Matthias Sutter, 2000. "Fair Allocation and Re-Weighting of Votes and Voting Power in the EU before and after the Next Enlargement," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 12(4), pages 433-449, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:36:y:1998:i:3:p:391-404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.