IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v53y2026i4p1508-1533.html

Do SPAC Combinations Affect Their Peers’ Financial Reporting Choices?

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Cohen
  • Kelly Ha
  • Sunay Mutlu
  • John Schomburger

Abstract

We explore whether firms going public through mergers with special purpose acquisition companies (SPAC combinations) influence the financial reporting practices of their peer firms. Although SPAC combinations provide an efficient alternative to traditional initial public offerings (IPOs) for private firms, recent studies show that SPAC combinations suffer from poor financial reporting quality. We extend this line of research by analyzing the effect of SPAC combinations on their peers. Focusing on peer firms’ earnings management activities, we show that peers of SPAC combinations increase their accrual‐based earnings management (AEM) in the subsequent years, whereas they decrease real activity‐based earnings management (REM). This result is in line with a contagion effect of SPAC combinations depressing the accrual quality of their peer group. On the other hand, peer firms decrease their REM, suggesting a substitutive relation between these two earnings management methods. Our study is the first to examine peer effects of SPAC combinations, and it provides a new perspective on the debate on the overall consequences of SPAC combinations.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Cohen & Kelly Ha & Sunay Mutlu & John Schomburger, 2026. "Do SPAC Combinations Affect Their Peers’ Financial Reporting Choices?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 1508-1533, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:53:y:2026:i:4:p:1508-1533
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.70070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.70070
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.70070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:53:y:2026:i:4:p:1508-1533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.