IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v53y2026i2p778-797.html

Liquidity Constraints and Auditor Responses to Repo Transactions

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Florackis
  • Yangxin Yu
  • John Ziyang Zhang

Abstract

Repurchase agreements (repos) are often used by banks to manipulate their reported quarter‐end risk levels. Prior research has documented adverse capital market consequences associated with active window dressing of repo liabilities. In this study, we investigate whether a client bank's repos also affect its auditor's risk assessment. We find that auditor responses to repos are contingent on the bank's liquidity constraints rather than on the extent of repo transactions. Specifically, downward quarter‐end deviations in repo liabilities are not perceived by auditors as risky for banks with greater liquidity. For banks with high liquidity constraints, however, we document a strong positive association between repo deviations and audit fees. Our findings suggest that auditors utilize the contextual cue of liquidity constraints to help resolve ambiguity surrounding repo transactions and accordingly charge higher fees for clients with higher liquidity risk. This main finding persists when a change in auditor or the issuance of a going‐concern opinion is used instead of audit fee as a measure of auditor response

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Florackis & Yangxin Yu & John Ziyang Zhang, 2026. "Liquidity Constraints and Auditor Responses to Repo Transactions," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 778-797, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:53:y:2026:i:2:p:778-797
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.70036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.70036
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.70036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bidisha Chakrabarty & Gaiyan Zhang, 2012. "Credit Contagion Channels: Market Microstructure Evidence from Lehman Brothers’ Bankruptcy," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 41(2), pages 320-343, June.
    2. Vladimir Kotomin & Drew Winters, 2006. "Quarter-End Effects in Banks: Preferred Habitat or Window Dressing?," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 29(1), pages 61-82, February.
    3. Simunic, Da, 1980. "The Pricing Of Audit Services - Theory And Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 161-190.
    4. Edward L. Owens & Joanna Shuang Wu, 2015. "Quarter-end repo borrowing dynamics and bank risk opacity," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1164-1209, September.
    5. Allen, Linda & Saunders, Anthony, 1992. "Bank window dressing: Theory and evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 585-623, June.
    6. Loutskina, Elena, 2011. "The role of securitization in bank liquidity and funding management," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(3), pages 663-684, June.
    7. Elton, Edwin J & Gruber, Martin J, 1971. "Improved Forecasting Through the Design of Homogeneous Groups," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 44(4), pages 432-450, October.
    8. Kim, Jaewoo, 2018. "Asymmetric timely loss recognition, adverse shocks to external capital, and underinvestment: Evidence from the collapse of the junk bond market," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 148-168.
    9. Chitru S. Fernando & Anthony D. May & William L. Megginson, 2012. "The Value of Investment Banking Relationships: Evidence from the Collapse of Lehman Brothers," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 67(1), pages 235-270, February.
    10. Bassi, Claudio & Behn, Markus & Grill, Michael & Waibel, Martin, 2024. "Window dressing of regulatory metrics: Evidence from repo markets," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    11. Liangliang Jiang & Mingming Ji, 2024. "Risk management committee and bank performance: Evidence from the adoption of the Dodd–Frank Act," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(7-8), pages 1762-1788, July.
    12. Gorton, Gary & Metrick, Andrew, 2012. "Securitized banking and the run on repo," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 425-451.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Z. Zhang, 2026. "Liquidity Constraints and Auditor Responses to Repo Transactions," Post-Print hal-05578404, HAL.
    2. Gorton, Gary & Metrick, Andrew & Xie, Lei, 2021. "The flight from maturity," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    3. Edward L. Owens & Joanna Shuang Wu, 2015. "Quarter-end repo borrowing dynamics and bank risk opacity," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1164-1209, September.
    4. Benjamin Munyan, 2015. "Regulatory Arbitrage in Repo Markets," Working Papers 15-22, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    5. Bassi, Claudio & Behn, Markus & Grill, Michael & Waibel, Martin, 2024. "Window dressing of regulatory metrics: Evidence from repo markets," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    6. Samuel Jebaraj Benjamin, 2019. "The Effect of Financial Constraints on Audit Fees," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 27(2), pages 59-87.
    7. Kotomin, Vladimir & Smith, Stanley D. & Winters, Drew B., 2008. "Preferred habitat for liquidity in international short-term interest rates," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 240-250, February.
    8. Battaglia, Francesca & Buchanan, Bonnie G. & Fiordelisi, Franco & Ricci, Ornella, 2021. "Securitization and crash risk: Evidence from large European banks," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Azizpour, S & Giesecke, K. & Schwenkler, G., 2018. "Exploring the sources of default clustering," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 154-183.
    10. Puriya Abbassi & Rajkamal Iyer & José-Luis Peydró & Paul E. Soto, 2025. "Stressed Banks? Evidence from the Largest-Ever Supervisory Review," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(10), pages 8390-8412, October.
    11. Christopher S. Sutherland, 2017. "What Explains Month-End Funding Pressure in Canada?," Discussion Papers 17-9, Bank of Canada.
    12. Ahmed S. Baig & Drew B. Winters, 2021. "Month-End Regularities in the Overnight Bank Funding Markets," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, May.
    13. Lei, Jin & Qiu, Jiaping & Wan, Chi & Yu, Fan, 2021. "Credit risk spillovers and cash holdings," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Chen, Zhizhen & Liu, Frank Hong & Opong, Kwaku & Zhou, Mingming, 2017. "Short-term safety or long-term failure? Empirical evidence of the impact of securitization on bank risk," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 48-74.
    15. Joe Peek & Eric Rosengren, 2013. "The role of banks in the transmission of monetary policy," Public Policy Discussion Paper 13-5, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    16. Santiago Carbó-Valverde & Richard J. Rosen & Francisco Rodríguez-Fernández, 2017. "Are covered bonds a substitute for mortgage-backed securities?," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 238-253, July.
    17. Shanshan Yang & Sherrill Shaffer, 2010. "Bank Window Dressing: A Re-Assessment and a Puzzle," CAMA Working Papers 2010-06, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    18. Andrea Mazzocchetti & Marco Raberto & Andrea Teglio & Silvano Cincotti, 2018. "Securitization and business cycle: an agent-based perspective," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(6), pages 1091-1121.
    19. Luis Garcia & Ulf Lewrick & Taja Sečnik, 2023. "Window Dressing and the Designation of Global Systemically Important Banks," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 64(2), pages 231-264, October.
    20. Mei Cheng & Yuan Zhang & Meiling Zhao, 2025. "The role of equity underwriters in shaping corporate disclosure," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 247-286, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:53:y:2026:i:2:p:778-797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.