IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v53y2026i1p53-76.html

Changes in Tax Footnote Disclosure Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas R. Kubick
  • Michael A. Mayberry

Abstract

We examine trends in the disclosure quality of the income tax footnote for US firms in annual 10‐K filings over the period 1996–2023. In contrast to claims by some practitioners and academics that the income tax footnote has become too complex, we document a marked increase in readability. Specifically, our results suggest that, while the quantity of textual disclosure in the income tax footnote has increased over time, the tax footnote has become more readable across several measures of readability. Changes in firm characteristics do not explain the improved trends in readability. We find some evidence suggesting that higher probabilities of IRS scrutiny and shareholder litigation attenuate, but do not reverse, the trends in readability. We also find that the language used in the income tax footnote has become more similar among industry peers over time. Finally, we show that improved tax footnote readability is associated with reduced dispersion in analyst tax forecasts, consistent with improvements in tax disclosure reaping capital market benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas R. Kubick & Michael A. Mayberry, 2026. "Changes in Tax Footnote Disclosure Quality," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 53-76, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:53-76
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.70009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.70009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.70009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:53-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.