IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v52y2025i5p2175-2209.html

Retail Investors’ Trades Around Comment Letter Disclosures

Author

Listed:
  • Ruby Brownen‐Trinh
  • Joe (Joonghi) Cho
  • Pawel Bilinski

Abstract

How sophisticated are retail investors in monitoring their holdings? We answer this question by examining Robinhood investors’ trades around the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) comment letter (CL) disclosures. We focus on CLs because, compared to periodic filings, CL disclosures are unscheduled (high search cost) and unstandardized with a significant variation in their content (high processing cost). We find that CLs attract Robinhood investors’ attention, as evidenced by a significant abnormal Google search volume index around CLs disclosure, particularly around more severe CLs. The number of Robinhood investors holding a stock reduces after a firm receives more severe CLs in anticipation of the future decline in stock prices. Our results are (i) robust to addressing the endogeneity concern; (ii) robust to controlling for concurrent information from insider sales, short‐selling activity, Twitter, press, analysts, and other concurrent CLs; and (iii) do not reflect Robinhood investors relying on heuristics in analyzing CLs’ content. Our evidence suggests that retail investors are sophisticated in processing CL disclosures as part of their portfolio monitoring activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruby Brownen‐Trinh & Joe (Joonghi) Cho & Pawel Bilinski, 2025. "Retail Investors’ Trades Around Comment Letter Disclosures," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 2175-2209, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:52:y:2025:i:5:p:2175-2209
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12863
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.12863?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:52:y:2025:i:5:p:2175-2209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.