IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v52y2025i4p2010-2036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lead Independent Directors and Corporate Tax Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Gao
  • Thomas Omer

Abstract

Companies voluntarily adopt lead independent directors (LIDs) for the benefits they could bring to the board, such as further improving board independence, mitigating unresolved agency issues, enhancing board monitoring, and countering criticisms of corporate governance. We find that companies with LIDs have more conservative tax policies. The influence of LIDs on corporate tax policies is greater when the level of tax avoidance is more aggressive compared to their size and industry peers. We also find that investors favorably value the more conservative tax policies of companies with LIDs. Companies with LIDs have lower tax risk, pursue more conservative tax planning, such as lower UTB settlements, and are less likely to use tax shelters. These companies do not have aggressive valuation allowance releases and have fewer permanent book‐tax differences. Lastly, we also find an associated non‐tax benefit: CEOs in companies with LIDs do not have a higher likelihood of subsequent forced turnover for not engaging in tax avoidance. Thus, he investors’ higher valuation of more conservative corporate tax policies reduces the likelihood of subsequent forced CEO turnover.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Gao & Thomas Omer, 2025. "Lead Independent Directors and Corporate Tax Policy," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2010-2036, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:52:y:2025:i:4:p:2010-2036
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12878
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.12878?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:52:y:2025:i:4:p:2010-2036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.