IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v52y2025i3p1328-1348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting Reporting Complexity as a Source of Insider Information Advantage: Evidence From Insider Trades

Author

Listed:
  • Scott Duellman
  • J. Philipp Klaus
  • Blair B. Marquardt

Abstract

Accounting reporting complexity (ARC) represents the overall difficulty in preparing and consuming the financial statements and is of growing concern to regulators and capital market stakeholders. Although financial statements serve to mitigate information asymmetry between preparers and users, complexity can hinder their effectiveness. We contribute to the evidence on this issue by examining insider trading profits conditional on ARC. Consistent with ARC producing an information advantage to insiders, we document higher returns to executives on the trades executed in the 60 days after the report filing as ARC increases. The most financially sophisticated and informed insiders, the CEO and CFO, appear to adjust their trading activity accordingly. Furthermore, high ARC firms have a weaker correlation between current and future earnings, a weaker earnings response coefficient, and a longer return drift. Collectively, the results document a novel and material cost of ARC. ARC impairs the informativeness of financial reports to market participants, exacerbating the information gap between insiders and other stakeholders. Insiders can use this to their advantage, as they face few trading constraints during the post‐filing period.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott Duellman & J. Philipp Klaus & Blair B. Marquardt, 2025. "Accounting Reporting Complexity as a Source of Insider Information Advantage: Evidence From Insider Trades," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 1328-1348, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:52:y:2025:i:3:p:1328-1348
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12845
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.12845?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:52:y:2025:i:3:p:1328-1348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.