IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v52y2025i1p342-373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple large shareholders and audit fees: Demand‐side evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaotong Yang
  • Fuxiu Jiang
  • John R. Nofsinger
  • Bo Zhang

Abstract

This paper provides evidence on the role of multiple large shareholders (MLSs) in the determination of audit pricing from a new demand‐side perspective, rather than the typical supply‐side perspective. We find that for Chinese A‐share listed firms, the presence of MLS is associated with significantly higher audit fees. The results are robust after we address endogeneity concerns and use auditor choice as an alternative proxy to capture demand for auditing. Further tests show that audit fees increase with the number and relative power of noncontrolling large shareholders. The positive impact of MLS on audit fees is more pronounced for state‐owned enterprises (SOE) than in family‐owned enterprises. Moreover, this positive impact of MLS is more pronounced for SOEs with foreign blockholders and non‐SOEs with independent institutional blockholders. This positive impact is also more pronounced for firms with higher information asymmetry, severe agency problems and higher litigation risk. Overall, our results provide consistent evidence that firms with MLS are likely to demand high‐quality auditing, leading to higher audit fees.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaotong Yang & Fuxiu Jiang & John R. Nofsinger & Bo Zhang, 2025. "Multiple large shareholders and audit fees: Demand‐side evidence from China," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 342-373, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:52:y:2025:i:1:p:342-373
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12816
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.12816?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:52:y:2025:i:1:p:342-373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.