IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v51y2024i9-10p2763-2790.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Audit partner style and financial statement comparability: New evidence from the US market

Author

Listed:
  • Tracie Frost
  • Zhijian Chris He
  • Xin Luo
  • Derrald Stice

Abstract

We explore the influence of individual audit partner style on financial statement comparability in a US setting using newly available data. We find evidence of an audit partner style effect on comparability incremental to audit firm and audit office effects. Our results are consistent across several comparability measures and are economically significant. For example, the audit partner effect is associated with a 12.59% decrease in the mean difference in abnormal accruals compared with a 4.4% decrease for firm pairs audited by the same Big 4 audit office. We also find that audit partner expertise and experience have a greater influence on comparability than audit office expertise and experience. Our results are consistent in endogeneity and robustness tests including (1) auditor switching tests, (2) entropy balancing, (3) placebo tests and (4) controlling for clients’ economic similarity. Our results suggest that the association between audit partner style and financial statement comparability persists in highly regulatory environments and corroborate the PCAOB's intuition that the role of the engagement partner “is of singular importance” to the outcome of the audit (PCAOB 2011).

Suggested Citation

  • Tracie Frost & Zhijian Chris He & Xin Luo & Derrald Stice, 2024. "Audit partner style and financial statement comparability: New evidence from the US market," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(9-10), pages 2763-2790, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:51:y:2024:i:9-10:p:2763-2790
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12798
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.12798?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:51:y:2024:i:9-10:p:2763-2790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.