IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v63y2012i2p377-391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative analysis of the information‐seeking behavior of visually impaired and sighted searchers

Author

Listed:
  • Nuzhah Gooda Sahib
  • Anastasios Tombros
  • Tony Stockman

Abstract

Understanding search behavior is important and leads to more effective interfaces that support searchers throughout the search process. In this article, through an observational user study, we investigate the search behavior of 15 visually impaired and 15 sighted searchers while they complete complex search tasks online. We study complex search tasks because they are challenging, cognitively intensive and affect performance of searchers. We compare the behavior of the two groups of searchers at four stages of the information‐seeking process namely, Query Formulation, Search Results Exploration, Query Reformulation, and Search Results Management. For each stage, we identify research questions to investigate the impact of speech‐based screen readers on the information‐seeking behavior of visually impaired users. Significant differences were observed during query formulation and in the use of query‐level support features such as query suggestions and spelling suggestions. In addition, screen‐reader users submitted a lower number of queries and displayed comparatively limited exploratory behavior during search results exploration. We investigate how a lack of visual cues affected visually impaired searchers' approach towards query reformulation and observed different strategies to manage and use information encountered during the search process. We discuss the implications that our findings have for the design of search interfaces and propose a set of design guidelines to consider when designing interfaces that are usable and accessible with screen readers. This work also enhances our understanding of search behavior when using an auditory interface and could be useful when designing audio‐based information retrieval systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuzhah Gooda Sahib & Anastasios Tombros & Tony Stockman, 2012. "A comparative analysis of the information‐seeking behavior of visually impaired and sighted searchers," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(2), pages 377-391, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:63:y:2012:i:2:p:377-391
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.21696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21696
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.21696?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephann Makri, 2020. "Information informing design: Information Science research with implications for the design of digital information environments," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(11), pages 1402-1412, November.
    2. Iris Xie & Rakesh Babu & Hyun Seung Lee & Shengang Wang & Tae Hee Lee, 2021. "Orientation tactics and associated factors in the digital library environment: Comparison between blind and sighted users," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(8), pages 995-1010, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:63:y:2012:i:2:p:377-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.