IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v63y2012i1p22-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science: Using three bibliometric methods

Author

Listed:
  • Yu‐Wei Chang
  • Mu‐Hsuan Huang

Abstract

This study uses three bibliometric methods: direct citation, bibliographic coupling, and co‐authorship analysis, to investigate interdisciplinary changes in library and information science (LIS) from 1978 to 2007. The results reveal that LIS researchers most frequently cite publications in their own discipline. In addition, half of all co‐authors of LIS articles are affiliated with LIS‐related institutes. The results confirm that the degree of interdisciplinarity within LIS has increased, particularly co‐authorship. However, the study found sources of direct citations in LIS articles are widely distributed across 30 disciplines, but co‐authors of LIS articles are distributed across only 25 disciplines. The degree of interdisciplinarity was found ranging from 0.61 to 0.82 with citation to references in all articles being the highest and that of co‐authorship being the lowest. Percentages of contribution attributable to LIS show a decreasing tendency based on the results of direct citation and co‐authorship analysis, but an increasing tendency based on those of bibliographic coupling analysis. Such differences indicate each of the three bibliometric methods has its strength and provides insights respectively for viewing various aspects of interdisciplinarity, suggesting the use of no single bibliometric method can reveal all aspects of interdisciplinarity due to its multifaceted nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu‐Wei Chang & Mu‐Hsuan Huang, 2012. "A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science: Using three bibliometric methods," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(1), pages 22-33, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:63:y:2012:i:1:p:22-33
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.21649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21649
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.21649?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:63:y:2012:i:1:p:22-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.