IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v62y2011i3p507-520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An ontology‐based technique for preserving user preferences in document‐category evolutions

Author

Listed:
  • Yen‐Hsien Lee
  • Chih‐Ping Wei
  • Paul Jen‐Hwa Hu

Abstract

Influxes of new documents over time necessitate reorganization of document categories that a user has created previously. As documents are available in increasing quantities and accelerating frequencies, the manual approach to reorganizing document categories becomes prohibitively tedious and ineffective, thus making a system‐oriented approach appealing. Previous research (Larsen & Aone, 1999; Pantel & Lin, 2002) largely has followed the category‐discovery approach, which groups documents by using a document‐clustering technique to partition a document corpus. This approach does not consider existing categories a user created previously, which in effect reflect his or her document‐grouping preference. A handful of studies (Wei, Hu, & Dong, 2002; Wei, Hu, & Lee, 2009) have taken a category‐evolution approach to develop lexicon‐based techniques for preserving user preference in document‐category reorganizations, but have serious limitations. Responding to the significance of document‐category reorganizations and addressing the fundamental problems of salient, lexicon‐based techniques, we develop an ontology‐based category evolution (ONCE), a technique that first enriches a concept hierarchy by incorporating important concept descriptors (jointly referred to as an ontology) and then employs the resulting enriched ontology to support category evolutions at a concept level rather than analyzing and comparing feature vectors at the lexicon level. We empirically evaluate our proposed technique and compare it with two benchmark techniques: CE2 (a lexicon‐based category‐evolution technique) and hierarchical agglomerative clustering (HAC; a conventional hierarchical document‐clustering technique). Overall, our results show that the ONCE technique is more effective than are CE2 and HAC, across all the scenarios studied. Furthermore, the completeness of a concept hierarchy has important impacts on the performance of the proposed technique. Our results have some important implications for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Yen‐Hsien Lee & Chih‐Ping Wei & Paul Jen‐Hwa Hu, 2011. "An ontology‐based technique for preserving user preferences in document‐category evolutions," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(3), pages 507-520, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:62:y:2011:i:3:p:507-520
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.21471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21471
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.21471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:62:y:2011:i:3:p:507-520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.