IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v61y2010i9p1909-1922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Faculty self‐archiving: Motivations and barriers

Author

Listed:
  • Jihyun Kim

Abstract

This study investigated factors that motivate or impede faculty participation in self‐archiving practices—the placement of research work in various open access (OA) venues, ranging from personal Web pages to OA archives. The author's research design involves triangulation of survey and interview data from 17 Carnegie doctorate universities with DSpace institutional repositories. The analysis of survey responses from 684 professors and 41 telephone interviews identified seven significant factors: (a) altruism—the idea of providing OA benefits for users; (b) perceived self‐archiving culture; (c) copyright concerns; (d) technical skills; (e) age; (f) perception of no harmful impact of self‐archiving on tenure and promotion; and (g) concerns about additional time and effort. The factors are listed in descending order of their effect size. Age, copyright concerns, and additional time and effort are negatively associated with self‐archiving, whereas remaining factors are positively related to it. Faculty are motivated by OA advantages to users, disciplinary norms, and no negative influence on academic reward. However, barriers to self‐archiving—concerns about copyright, extra time and effort, technical ability, and age—imply that the provision of services to assist faculty with copyright management, and with technical and logistical issues, could encourage higher rates of self‐archiving.

Suggested Citation

  • Jihyun Kim, 2010. "Faculty self‐archiving: Motivations and barriers," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(9), pages 1909-1922, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:61:y:2010:i:9:p:1909-1922
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.21336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21336
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.21336?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Zhiqi & Chen, Yue & Glänzel, Wolfgang, 2020. "Preprints as accelerator of scholarly communication: An empirical analysis in Mathematics," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4).
    2. Sergio Copiello, 2020. "Digital multimedia tools, research impact, stated and revealed preferences: a rejoinder on the issue of video abstracts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(1), pages 543-551, April.
    3. Zhiqi Wang & Wolfgang Glänzel & Yue Chen, 2020. "The impact of preprints in Library and Information Science: an analysis of citations, usage and social attention indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1403-1423, November.
    4. Laura Icela González-Pérez & María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya & Francisco José García-Peñalvo, 2021. "Improving Institutional Repositories through User-Centered Design: Indicators from a Focus Group," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:61:y:2010:i:9:p:1909-1922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.