IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v60y2009i5p953-968.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An exploration into the practices of library Web usability in ARL academic libraries

Author

Listed:
  • Yu‐Hui Chen
  • Carol Anne Germain
  • Huahai Yang

Abstract

A survey of the 113 academic libraries of the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) was administered to investigate whether Web usability Policies/Standards/Guidelines (PSGs) are in place, the levels of difficulty surrounding implementation, the impact of PSGs on actual usability practice, e.g., testing, resources, etc., and the relationship between ARL ranking and usability practice or PSGs. The response rate was over 74%. Results show that 25 (30%) libraries have PSGs dedicated to Web usability. Seventy‐one (85%) libraries have conducted usability testing on their main Web sites, online public access catalogs (OPAC), or lower‐level pages. Nevertheless, only seven libraries performed iterative testing of these platforms at pre‐, during, and post‐design stages. Statistical analysis indicates that having PSGs does not affect the amount of usability testing performed or the resources available for library Web usability initiatives. In addition, ARL ranking has no or little impact on PSGs, testing, or resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu‐Hui Chen & Carol Anne Germain & Huahai Yang, 2009. "An exploration into the practices of library Web usability in ARL academic libraries," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(5), pages 953-968, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:60:y:2009:i:5:p:953-968
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.21032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21032
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.21032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:60:y:2009:i:5:p:953-968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.