IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v60y2009i2p247-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of frame semantic annotation levels, frame‐alignment techniques, and fusion methods on factoid answer processing

Author

Listed:
  • Bahadorreza Ofoghi
  • John Yearwood
  • Liping Ma

Abstract

The impact of frame semantic enrichment of texts on the task of factoid question answering (QA) is studied in this paper. In particular, we consider different techniques for answer processing with frame semantics: the level of semantic class identification and role assignment to texts, and the fusion of frame semantic‐based answer‐processing approaches with other methods used in the Text REtrieval Conference (TREC). The impact of each of these aspects on the overall performance of a QA system is analyzed in this paper. The TREC 2004 and TREC 2006 factoid question sets were used for the experiments. These demonstrate that the exploitation of encapsulated frame semantics in FrameNet in a shallow semantic parsing process can enhance answer‐processing performance in factoid QA systems. This improvement is dependent on the level of semantic annotation, the frame semantic alignment method, and the method of fusing frame semantic‐based answer‐processing models with other existing models. A more comprehensively annotated environment with all different part‐of‐speech target predicates provides a higher chance of correct factoid answer retrieval where semantic alignment is based on both semantic classes and a relaxed set of semantic roles for answer span identification. Our experiments on fusion techniques of frame semantic‐based and entity‐based answer‐processing models show that merging answer lists with respect to their scores and redundancy by exploiting a fusion function leads to a more effective overall factoid QA system compared to the use of individual models.

Suggested Citation

  • Bahadorreza Ofoghi & John Yearwood & Liping Ma, 2009. "The impact of frame semantic annotation levels, frame‐alignment techniques, and fusion methods on factoid answer processing," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(2), pages 247-263, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:60:y:2009:i:2:p:247-263
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.20989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20989
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.20989?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:60:y:2009:i:2:p:247-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.