Author
Listed:
- Aurélie Névéol
- Thomas M. Deserno
- Stéfan J. Darmoni
- Mark Oliver Güld
- Alan R. Aronson
Abstract
One of the most significant recent advances in health information systems has been the shift from paper to electronic documents. While research on automatic text and image processing has taken separate paths, there is a growing need for joint efforts, particularly for electronic health records and biomedical literature databases. This work aims at comparing text‐based versus image‐based access to multimodal medical documents using state‐of‐the‐art methods of processing text and image components. A collection of 180 medical documents containing an image accompanied by a short text describing it was divided into training and test sets. Content‐based image analysis and natural language processing techniques are applied individually and combined for multimodal document analysis. The evaluation consists of an indexing task and a retrieval task based on the “gold standard” codes manually assigned to corpus documents. The performance of text‐based and image‐based access, as well as combined document features, is compared. Image analysis proves more adequate for both the indexing and retrieval of the images. In the indexing task, multimodal analysis outperforms both independent image and text analysis. This experiment shows that text describing images can be usefully analyzed in the framework of a hybrid text/image retrieval system.
Suggested Citation
Aurélie Névéol & Thomas M. Deserno & Stéfan J. Darmoni & Mark Oliver Güld & Alan R. Aronson, 2009.
"Natural language processing versus content‐based image analysis for medical document retrieval,"
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(1), pages 123-134, January.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:jamist:v:60:y:2009:i:1:p:123-134
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20955
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:60:y:2009:i:1:p:123-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.