IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v58y2007i9p1242-1253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do information technology units have more power than other units in academic libraries?

Author

Listed:
  • Sook Lim

Abstract

Systems offices that deal with library information technologies have played an important role in academic libraries; however, not much is known about how systems offices are positioned within academic libraries. This study examined the present status and the influence of systems offices by exploring the power differences among five principal functional units based on strategic contingencies theory. A mail questionnaire was sent to the principal functional unit heads of each of 95 university libraries belonging to the Association of Research Libraries in the United States. A total of 484 questionnaires were sent; 235 questionnaires were returned. The three major findings of this study were that (a) systems offices had more perceived power than all but public services; (b) systems offices had higher levels on contingency variables than did most of the other units; and finally, (c) criticality was a factor affecting perceived power between systems offices and most of the other units. The study findings imply that strategic contingencies theory may be partially applicable to library settings. Library staff or units may strategically increase their power by aligning their services with goals critical to their library and cooperating with other staff or other units.

Suggested Citation

  • Sook Lim, 2007. "Do information technology units have more power than other units in academic libraries?," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(9), pages 1242-1253, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:58:y:2007:i:9:p:1242-1253
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.20603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20603
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.20603?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oksana L. Zavalina & Priya Kizhakkethil & Daniel Gelaw Alemneh & Mark E. Phillips & Hannah Tarver, 2015. "Building a Framework of Metadata Change to Support Knowledge Management," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(01), pages 1-16.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:58:y:2007:i:9:p:1242-1253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.