IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v56y2005i3p299-309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing anti‐terrorism resource allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Steven R. Haynes
  • Thomas George Kannampallil
  • Lawrence L. Larson
  • Nitesh Garg

Abstract

Since spring of 2002 we have been working on a methodology, decision model, and cognitive support system to aid with effective allocation of anti‐terrorism (AT) resources at Marine Corps installations. The work has so far been focused on the military domain, but the model and the software tools developed to implement it are generalizable to a range of commercial and public‐sector settings including industrial parks, corporate campuses, and civic facilities. The approach suggests that anti‐terrorism decision makers determine mitigation project allocations using measures of facility priority and mitigation project utility as inputs to the allocation algorithm. The three‐part hybrid resource allocation model presented here uses multi‐criteria decision‐making techniques to assess facility (e.g., building, hangar) priorities, a utility function to calculate anti‐terrorism project mitigation values (e.g., protective glazing, wall coatings, and stand‐off barriers) and optimization techniques to determine resource allocations across multiple, competing AT mitigation projects. The model has been realized in a cognitive support system developed as a set of loosely coupled Web services. The approach, model, and cognitive support system have been evaluated using the cognitive walkthrough method with prospective system users in the field. In this paper we describe the domain, the problem space, the decision model, the cognitive support system and summary results of early model and system evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven R. Haynes & Thomas George Kannampallil & Lawrence L. Larson & Nitesh Garg, 2005. "Optimizing anti‐terrorism resource allocation," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 56(3), pages 299-309, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:56:y:2005:i:3:p:299-309
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.20120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20120
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.20120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:56:y:2005:i:3:p:299-309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.