IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v55y2004i9p794-806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using the information seeker to elicit construct models for search engine evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah E. Crudge
  • Frances C. Johnson

Abstract

With the rise of interactive search engines, direct access to information is available to the end user. Evaluation of these systems is clearly important for their comparison and development. From the perspective of the user engaged with the system in some information‐seeking task, the range of relevant evaluation factors could be considerable. This article presents an investigation into the suitability of repertory grid technique eliciting a mental model of search engines in the user. Such a model comprises constructs held important to the user, which can be used to evaluate the system. The design of the repertory grid application is described and the data analyzed in two stages. The important issues in determining the suitability of the method are identified and the constructs are analyzed to determine their association, discriminatory ability, and clustering around a central overall rating. From this, it is concluded that repertory grid technique is appropriate for user‐centered determination of evaluative constructs. Further analysis of the characteristics of the resulting construct set is undertaken towards establishing an underlying user model of the search engines, and further research is identified for its use in system evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah E. Crudge & Frances C. Johnson, 2004. "Using the information seeker to elicit construct models for search engine evaluation," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 55(9), pages 794-806, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:55:y:2004:i:9:p:794-806
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.20023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20023
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.20023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:55:y:2004:i:9:p:794-806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.