IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v55y2004i11p970-979.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of document presentation order and number of documents judged on users' judgments of relevance

Author

Listed:
  • Mu‐hsuan Huang
  • Hui‐yu Wang

Abstract

This article attempts to verify the hypothesis of the document presentation order by an empirical, two‐stage experiment. It aims to identify the relationship between number of documents judged and order effect. The results indicate that significant order effect takes place when 15 and 30 documents are presented. Sets with 45 and 60 documents still reveal the order effect. However, subjects are not influenced by order of presentation when the set of documents has 5 and 75 members, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Mu‐hsuan Huang & Hui‐yu Wang, 2004. "The influence of document presentation order and number of documents judged on users' judgments of relevance," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 55(11), pages 970-979, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:55:y:2004:i:11:p:970-979
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.20047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20047
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.20047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:55:y:2004:i:11:p:970-979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.