IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v54y2003i10p926-938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The changing face of scientific discourse: Analysis of genomic and proteomic database usage and acceptance

Author

Listed:
  • Cecelia Brown

Abstract

The explosion of the field of molecular biology is paralleled by the growth in usage and acceptance of Web‐based genomic and proteomic databases (GPD) such as GenBank and Protein Data Bank in the scholarly communication of scientists. Surveys, case studies, analysis of bibliographic records from Medline and CAPlus, and examination of “Instructions to Authors” sections of molecular biology journals all confirm the integral role of GPD in the scientific literature cycle. Over the past 20 years the place of GPD in the culture of molecular biologists was observed to move from tacit implication to explicit knowledge. Originally journals suggested deposition of data in GDP but by the late1980s, the majority of journals mandated deposition of data for a manuscript to be accepted for publication. A surge subsequently occurred in the number of articles retrievable from Medline and CAPlus using the keyword “GenBank”. GPD were not found to a new form of publication, but rather a fundamental storage and retrieval mechanism for vast amounts of molecular biology information that support the creation of scientific intellectual property. For science to continue to advance, scientists unequivocally agreed that GDP must remain free of peer‐review and available at no charge to the public. The results suggest that the existing models of scientific communication should be updated to incorporate GDP data deposition into the current continuum of scientific communication.

Suggested Citation

  • Cecelia Brown, 2003. "The changing face of scientific discourse: Analysis of genomic and proteomic database usage and acceptance," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 54(10), pages 926-938, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:54:y:2003:i:10:p:926-938
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.10289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10289
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.10289?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lázaro Pereira de Oliveira & Claudio Pitassi & Antônio Augusto Gonçalves, 2015. "Technological Cooperation Networks at Bio-Manguinhos: the Role of Information and Communication Technologies," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 12(3), pages 42-66, May.
    2. Charlie Mayor & Lyn Robinson, 2014. "Ontological realism and classification: Structures and concepts in the Gene Ontology," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(4), pages 686-697, April.
    3. Liwei Zhang & Liang Ma, 2021. "Does open data boost journal impact: evidence from Chinese economics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3393-3419, April.
    4. Piwowar, Heather A. & Chapman, Wendy W., 2010. "Public sharing of research datasets: A pilot study of associations," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 148-156.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:54:y:2003:i:10:p:926-938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.