IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v53y2002i4p295-307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research anxiety and students' perceptions of research: An experiment. Part II. Content analysis of their writings on two experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Jacqueline Kracker
  • Peiling Wang

Abstract

This is Part II of an experimental study investigating students' perceptions of research and research paper anxiety. The study integrates quantitative and qualitative designs to collect complimentary data. The participants were students in four sections of an upper division undergraduate course on technical and professional writing during the fall of 1999. A survey instrument used the Critical Incident Technique to solicit writings in students' own words about a memorable past research and writing experience at the beginning of the semester and the current research and writing at the end of the semester. The quantitative part of the survey measured students' perceptions about research using a questionnaire with five‐point Likert scale, and students' anxiety levels using a standard state anxiety test (STAI Y‐1). The first article, Part I, provides a detailed description of the experimental design and reports on quantitative results. This article reports on content analysis of students' writings about their experiences of the two research projects. Analysis of the data confirmed Kuhlthau's Information Search Process (ISP) model and revealed additional affective and cognitive aspects related to research and writing.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacqueline Kracker & Peiling Wang, 2002. "Research anxiety and students' perceptions of research: An experiment. Part II. Content analysis of their writings on two experiences," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 53(4), pages 295-307.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:53:y:2002:i:4:p:295-307
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.10041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10041
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.10041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:53:y:2002:i:4:p:295-307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.