IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v53y2002i4p282-294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research anxiety and students' perceptions of research: An experiment. Part I. Effect of teaching Kuhlthau's ISP model

Author

Listed:
  • Jacqueline Kracker

Abstract

This two‐part study investigates the effect of a 30‐minute presentation of Carol Kuhlthau's Information Search Process (ISP) model on students' perceptions of research and research paper anxiety. An experiment was designed to collect both quantitative and qualitative data during a semester. An upper division undergraduate course, Technical and Professional Writing, with four sections participated in the experiment in fall 1999. A survey instrument, the Research Process Survey (RPS), was developed to collect data about students' feelings and thoughts at the onset of their course research project (pretest) and at the completion of the project (posttest). A standard anxiety test (STAI Y‐1) was adopted to measure anxiety levels during pretest and posttest sessions and at two additional points between. Two of the four sections heard a guest presentation of the ISP model as treatment after the pretest; the other two sections heard a different guest speak about career experiences as a technical writer (a placebo talk). The results of this experiment are reported in two articles according to the nature of the collected data. This article reports on results of the quantitative analysis. Four hypotheses were proposed to examine the effects on awareness of cognitive aspects, awareness of affective aspects, level of anxiety, and satisfaction with research. One hypothesis was supported. A significant change in anxiety levels was measured (p = 0.5). Although statistical tests did not reject three null hypotheses, positive trends in change as a result of the ISP model were identified. A second article reports on results of qualitative analysis of the texts that participants wrote about a memorable past research experience and about the current research experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacqueline Kracker, 2002. "Research anxiety and students' perceptions of research: An experiment. Part I. Effect of teaching Kuhlthau's ISP model," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 53(4), pages 282-294.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:53:y:2002:i:4:p:282-294
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.10040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10040
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.10040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sara E. Grineski & Danielle X. Morales & Timothy W. Collins & Shawna Nadybal & Shaylynn Trego, 2022. "A US National Study of Barriers to Science Training Experienced by Undergraduate Students during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-19, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:53:y:2002:i:4:p:282-294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.