IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v53y2002i2p120-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Web searching: A process‐oriented experimental study of three interactive search paradigms

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Dennis
  • Peter Bruza
  • Robert McArthur

Abstract

This article compares search effectiveness when using query‐based Internet search (via the Google search engine), directory‐based search (via Yahoo), and phrase‐based query reformulation‐assisted search (via the Hyperindex browser) by means of a controlled, user‐based experimental study. The focus was to evaluate aspects of the search process. Cognitive load was measured using a secondary digit‐monitoring task to quantify the effort of the user in various search states; independent relevance judgements were employed to gauge the quality of the documents accessed during the search process and time was monitored as a function of search state. Results indicated directory‐based search does not offer increased relevance over the query‐based search (with or without query formulation assistance), and also takes longer. Query reformulation does significantly improve the relevance of the documents through which the user must trawl, particularly when the formulation of query terms is more difficult. However, the improvement in document relevance comes at the cost of increased search time, although this difference is quite small when the search is self‐terminated. In addition, the advantage of the query reformulation seems to occur as a consequence of providing more discriminating terms rather than by increasing the length of queries.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Dennis & Peter Bruza & Robert McArthur, 2002. "Web searching: A process‐oriented experimental study of three interactive search paradigms," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 53(2), pages 120-133.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:53:y:2002:i:2:p:120-133
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.10015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10015
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.10015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:53:y:2002:i:2:p:120-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.