IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v53y2002i14p1251-1258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complementary user‐centered methodologies for information seeking and use: System's design in the Biological Information Browsing Environment (BIBE)

Author

Listed:
  • P. Bryan Heidorn
  • Bharat Mehra
  • Mary F. Lokhaiser

Abstract

Complementary, socially grounded, user‐centered methodologies are being used to design new information systems to support biodiversity informatics. Each of the methods—interviews, focus groups, field observations, immersion, and lab testing—has its own strengths and weaknesses. Methods vary in their ability to reveal the automatic processes of experts (that need to be learned by novices), data richness, and their ability to help interpret complex information needs and processes. When applied in concert, the methods provide a much clearer picture of the use of information while performing a real life information‐mediated task. This picture will be used to help inform the design of a new information system, Biological Information Browsing Environment (BIBE). The groups being studied are high school students, teachers, and volunteer adult groups performing biodiversity surveys. In this task the people must identify and record information about many species of flora and fauna. Most of the information tools they use for training and during the survey are designed to facilitate the difficult species identification task.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Bryan Heidorn & Bharat Mehra & Mary F. Lokhaiser, 2002. "Complementary user‐centered methodologies for information seeking and use: System's design in the Biological Information Browsing Environment (BIBE)," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 53(14), pages 1251-1258, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:53:y:2002:i:14:p:1251-1258
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.10168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10168
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.10168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:53:y:2002:i:14:p:1251-1258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.