IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v52y2001i7p517-535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User preferences in the classification of electronic bookmarks: Implications for a shared system

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Gottlieb
  • Juris Dilevko

Abstract

Using the financial industry as a context, the following study seeks to address the issue of the classification of electronic bookmarks in a multi‐user system by investigating what factors influence how individuals develop categories for bookmarks and how they choose to classify bookmarks within those organizational categories. An experiment was conducted in which a sample of 15 participants was asked to bookmark and to categorize 60 web sites within Internet Browser folders of their own creation. Based on the data collected during this first component of the study, individual, customized questionnaires were composed for each participant. Whereas some of the questions within these surveys focused on particular classificatory decisions regarding specific bookmarks, others looked at how the participant defined, utilized, and structured the category folders that comprised his or her classification system. The results presented in this paper focus on issues investigated in Kwasnik's (Journal of Documentation, 1991, 47, 389–398) study of the factors that inform how individuals organize their personal, paper‐based documents in office environments. Whereas classificatory attributes culled from questionnaire responses nominally resembled those identified by Kwasnik, it was found that a number of these factors assumed distinctive definitions in the electronic environment. The present study suggests that the application of individual instances of classificatory attributes and the distinction between Content and Context Attributes emphasized by Kwasnik play a minimal role in the development of a multi‐user classification system for bookmarks.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Gottlieb & Juris Dilevko, 2001. "User preferences in the classification of electronic bookmarks: Implications for a shared system," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 52(7), pages 517-535.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:52:y:2001:i:7:p:517-535
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.1101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1101
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.1101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:52:y:2001:i:7:p:517-535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.