IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v52y2001i5p391-401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An experimental study in automatically categorizing medical documents

Author

Listed:
  • Berthier Ribeiro‐Neto
  • Alberto H.F. Laender
  • Luciano R.S. de Lima

Abstract

In this article, we evaluate the retrieval performance of an algorithm that automatically categorizes medical documents. The categorization, which consists in assigning an International Code of Disease (ICD) to the medical document under examination, is based on well‐known information retrieval techniques. The algorithm, which we proposed, operates in a fully automatic mode and requires no supervision or training data. Using a database of 20,569 documents, we verify that the algorithm attains levels of average precision in the 70–80% range for category coding and in the 60–70% range for subcategory coding. We also carefully analyze the case of those documents whose categorization is not in accordance with the one provided by the human specialists. The vast majority of them represent cases that can only be fully categorized with the assistance of a human subject (because, for instance, they require specific knowledge of a given pathology). For a slim fraction of all documents (0.77% for category coding and 1.4% for subcategory coding), the algorithm makes assignments that are clearly incorrect. However, this fraction corresponds to only one‐fourth of the mistakes made by the human specialists.

Suggested Citation

  • Berthier Ribeiro‐Neto & Alberto H.F. Laender & Luciano R.S. de Lima, 2001. "An experimental study in automatically categorizing medical documents," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 52(5), pages 391-401.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:52:y:2001:i:5:p:391-401
    DOI: 10.1002/1532-2890(2001)9999:99993.0.CO;2-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1532-2890(2001)9999:99993.0.CO;2-1
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1532-2890(2001)9999:99993.0.CO;2-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:52:y:2001:i:5:p:391-401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.