IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v52y2001i13p1089-1099.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new method for analyzing scientific productivity

Author

Listed:
  • John C. Huber

Abstract

Previously, a new method for measuring scientific productivity was demonstrated for authors in mathematical logic and some subareas of 19th‐century physics. The purpose of this article is to apply this new method to other fields to support its general applicability. We show that the method yields the same results for modern physicists, biologists, psychologists, inventors, and composers. That is, each individual's production is constant over time, and the time‐period fluctuations follow the Poisson distribution. However, the productivity (e.g., papers per year) varies widely across individuals. We show that the distribution of productivity does not follow the normal (i.e., bell curve) distribution, but rather follows the exponential distribution. Thus, most authors produce at the lowest rate and very few authors produce at the higher rates. We also show that the career duration of individuals follows the exponential distribution. Thus, most authors have a very short career and very few have a long career. The principal advantage of the new method is that the detail structure of author productivity can be examined, such as trends, etc. Another advantage is that information science studies have guidance for the length of time interval being examined and estimating when an author's entire body of work has been recorded.

Suggested Citation

  • John C. Huber, 2001. "A new method for analyzing scientific productivity," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 52(13), pages 1089-1099.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:52:y:2001:i:13:p:1089-1099
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.1173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1173
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.1173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:52:y:2001:i:13:p:1089-1099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.